Security analysis & hardening review
Security Analysis & Hardening Review
Find the practical security gaps in your web application, access and infrastructure, and get a prioritised plan to close them.
Plan a practical security review
A structured review of application code, dependencies, access and infrastructure for systems we can support. It is the sensible step before a formal penetration test, not a replacement for one.
- What to bring
- Bring access to the code and infrastructure, a list of third-party services, and any customer security questions you need to answer.
- What we agree first
- A risk-ranked findings list with a hardening plan, and a named owner and least-privilege access for each account.
Illustrative example · not client work
How the review is scoped
- Inventory: list the application, services, accounts and dependencies in scope.
- Review: check code, patch levels, access, secrets and configuration against common failure modes.
- Prioritise: rank each finding by risk and by the effort to close it.
Where this fits
- A customer or partner has asked how you protect their data.
- Your application handles logins, payments or personal data.
- Dependencies and servers have not been updated in a long time.
- Access is shared through generic logins with no record of who has what.
- You want a baseline before a formal audit by specialists.
Benefits to work towards
- A clear view of where the real risks are
- A prioritised, practical hardening plan
- Least-privilege access with an owner for each account
- A safer position before any formal audit
A practical review, clearly bounded
This engagement looks for the security problems that most often cause real incidents: out-of-date dependencies, weak or shared access, secrets stored in the wrong place, misconfigured infrastructure, and missing logging. It is a review of systems built on technologies we support in production.
What it is not
It is not a penetration test and not a certification. Those are separate disciplines carried out by qualified specialists. If your situation calls for one, the review will say so plainly — and you will be in a better position to pass it.
What you receive
A written assessment that ranks each finding by risk and by the effort to fix it, along with a hardening plan. Where a fix is small and low-risk it can be included by agreement; anything larger is quoted separately so you stay in control of scope.
Access and ownership
Part of the review is making sure every account, server and third-party service has a named owner and least-privilege access, so the improvement holds after the engagement ends.
Review coverage
Application
- Application security review (OWASP-aware)
- Dependency and patch-level assessment
- Authentication and session review
Access and infrastructure
- Access, roles and secret-storage review
- Infrastructure and configuration checks
Recovery and response
- Backup and recovery verification
- Logging and alerting review
- Prioritised remediation plan
Typical use cases
A SaaS product needs to answer a customer security questionnaire honestly.
A business inherited a system and does not know how exposed it is.
A team wants the obvious gaps closed before paying for a formal penetration test.
Technical confidence
This is a practical review of architecture, access, dependencies and configuration for systems built on technologies we run in production. Formal penetration testing and regulatory certification are separate disciplines carried out by qualified specialists, and we will say when that is what you need.
See our full technical capabilities →